27 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1175, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,285 Louise T. Meyer and David C. Meyer v. California and Hawaiian Sugar Company, Robert O. Nagle, Donald W. Hare, Donald T. Hanson and Donald Martin

Good Law
662 F.2d 637
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 30, 198179-4536California1,747 words

Opinion

Opinion

662 F.2d 637 27 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1175 , 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,285 Louise T. MEYER and David C. Meyer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA AND HAWAIIAN SUGAR COMPANY, Robert O. Nagle, Donald W. Hare, Donald T. Hanson and Donald Martin, Defendants-Appellees. No. 79-4536. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 12, 1981. Decided Nov. 30, 1981. Robin B. Johansen, Rosen & Remcho, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Donald Connors, Jr., Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before MARKEY, * Chief Judge, United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, and HUG and POOLE, Circuit Judges. POOLE, Circuit Judge: 1 Plaintiffs Louise and David Meyer appeal the summary judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in favor of defendant C&H Sugar Co. For reasons stated below, we affirm that judgment. FACTS 2 As of November 1977, Louise Meyer, a 57 year old woman, held the position of Administrative Assistant in the Personnel Department of California and Hawaiian…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.