Ace Novelty Co., Inc. v. Gooding Amusement Co., Inc.

Good Law
664 F.2d 761·33 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 179·1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15025
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 198180-3461California962 words

Opinion

Opinion

Farris, J.

Plaintiff Ace Novelty Co. filed an antitrust action in November, 1975 against the defendants, Gooding Amusement Co. and the American Freedom Train Foundation, in which it alleged that the defendants prevented it from selling patriotic souvenirs near the defendants’ “Freedom Train” during the train’s cross-country 1975-76 Bicentennial Tour. Instead, exclusive concessionaire’s rights were granted to codefendant Jerry L. Kaltenbach Enterprises.

Ace Novelty’s pretrial discovery consisted of one document request in April 1976 and two depositions, one in July 1976 and the other in May 1979. Thirteen months after Ace Novelty filed its last deposition, defendant Foundation moved to dismiss because of Ace Novelty’s failure to prosecute. The court dismissed the action, under Fed. R. Civ.P. 41(b) and W.D.Wash. CR 41(b), because the “cause has been pending in this court for more than one (1) year, without any proceeding of record having been taken.” Local civil rule 41(b) codifies the inherent power of a court to dismiss a case for a party’s failure to prosecute, see Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626 , 82 S. Ct. 1386 , 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962), by providing that the court may, on its own…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.