Jack Harris, II v. City of Roseburg, Municipal Corporation, John Miller and Les Bergman

Good Law
65 A.L.R. Fed. 792·664 F.2d 1121·1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14907
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 28, 198180-3027California4,549 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jameson, J.

Defendant-appellee Bergman, a police officer of the City of Roseburg, was present at an illegal repossession by a creditor of a semi-tractor purchased under contract by plaintiff-appellant, Jack Harris. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Bergman and the City of Rose-burg, holding that Bergman could not be held liable for an alleged deprivation of appellant’s constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , because the officer never had actual or constructive possession of the semi-tractor. Although we conclude that the court incorrectly interpreted § 1983, we affirm on the ground that Bergman was immune from liability because he acted in good faith and with a reasonable belief that his conduct was lawful.

I. Factual Background

Harris purchased a semi-tractor on contract from Lee Cantwell, who retained a security interest. Harris was delinquent in his payments, and in December, 1977 Cant-well’s attorney wrote Harris threatening to institute legal proceedings. Although Harris paid Cantwell $3,000 over the next four months, Cantwell decided to repossess the semi-tractor in April, 1978.

Fearing violence if he attempted to repossess the vehicle alone, Cantwell…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.