Crow Tribe of Indians v. State of Montana, and Ramon Dore, Director, Montana Department of Revenue

Good Law
665 F.2d 1390·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 22873
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 5, 198279-4321California179 words

Opinion

ORDER

Before TANG, FLETCHER and ALAR-CON, Circuit Judges.

The opinion 650 F.2d 1104 (9th Cir.) filed July 13, 1981 is amended as follows:

The following footnotes are added:

4a footnotes the sentence on page 1111, left-hand column, ending on line 4 with the word “tax”:

“4a. The tax incidence on the Tribe’s royalty interest was not at issue and was not reached by the court.”

15a footnotes the sentence on page 1114, right-hand column ending on line 21 with the citation to Washington v. Confederated Tribes of Colville, 447 U.S. 134, 163 , 100 S.Ct. 2069, 2085 , 65 L.Ed.2d 10 (1980):

The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the proposal to amend the opinion, and of the suggestion for en banc rehearing, and no judge has objected to the amendment or requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed.R.App. 35(b).

The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for a rehearing en banc is rejected.