Jartech, Inc., Anatuna, Inc., Cinema 7, Inc., and Mooks, Inc., All California Corporations v. James J. Clancy, Gordon Bricken, James E. Ward, David L. Brandt, David F. Ortiz, Jartech, Inc. Anatuna, Inc. Cinema Seven, Inc. And Mooks, Inc., All California Corporations v. James J. Clancy Gordon Bricken James E. Ward David L. Brandt David F. Ortiz, James J. Clancy, Gordon Bricken, James E. Ward, David L. Brandt, David F. Ortiz, Counter-Claimants/appellants v. Jartech, Inc., Anatuna, Inc., Cinema 7, Inc., and Mooks, Inc., All California Corporations, James Mitchell, Artie Mitchell, Mitchell Brothers Film Group, a General Partnership, Counter-Defendants/appellees

Good Law
666 F.2d 403·213 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1057·8 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1404·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 22370
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 198280-5010California2,745 words

Opinion

Opinion

666 F.2d 403 213 U.S.P.Q. 1057 , 1982 Copr.L.Dec. P 25,356 , 8 Media L. Rep. 1404 JARTECH, INC., Anatuna, Inc., Cinema 7, Inc., and Mooks, Inc., all California Corporations, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James J. CLANCY, Gordon Bricken, James E. Ward, David L. Brandt, David F. Ortiz, Defendants-Appellees. JARTECH, INC.; Anatuna, Inc.; Cinema Seven, Inc.; and Mooks, Inc., all California Corporations, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James J. CLANCY; Gordon Bricken; James E. Ward; David L. Brandt; David F. Ortiz, Defendants-Appellees. James J. CLANCY, Gordon Bricken, James E. Ward, David L. Brandt, David F. Ortiz, Counter-Claimants/Appellants, v. JARTECH, INC., Anatuna, Inc., Cinema 7, Inc., and Mooks, Inc., all California Corporations, James Mitchell, Artie Mitchell, Mitchell Brothers Film Group, a general partnership, Counter-Defendants/Appellees. Nos. 79-3087, 80-5010 and 80-5016. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Jan. 25, 1982. 1 Meredith Bradford, San Francisco, Cal., for Jartech. 2 James J. Clancy, Sun Valley, Cal., argued, for Clancy; David A. Depew, Alhambra, Cal., on brief. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 4 Before HUG…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.