Townsend v. Columbia Operations

Good Law
667 F.2d 844
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 8, 198279-4638California3,235 words

Opinion

Opinion

667 F.2d 844 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,446 Charles E. TOWNSEND, Jr. and Henry L. Pohndorf, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COLUMBIA OPERATIONS, Columbia Petroleum, Inc., Anton G. Nosek, III, Mindevco, Inc., Chaparral Petroleum, and Ben M. Fitzgerald, Defendants-Appellees. No. 79-4638. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 13, 1981. Decided Feb. 8, 1982. 1 Kenneth M. Christison, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. 2 Allan I. Shatkin, Gordon, Holstein & Ropers, Inc., San Francisco, Cal., Rauer L. Meyer, Bushkin, Kopelson, Gaims, Gaines & Wolf, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 4 Before GOODWIN and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and WYATT * , District Judge. WYATT, District Judge: 5 This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a summary judgment for defendants entered on August 24, 1979. We affirm. 1. 6 The action was commenced on May 24, 1978. 7 After various maneuvers and a hearing of motions, a first amended complaint was filed on May 9, 1979. This is the only pleading for plaintiffs now effective, and, for convenience, it will hereafter be referred to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.