National Labor Relations Board v. Driver Salesmen

670 F.2d 855 93 Lab.Cas. P 13,370 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. DRIVER SALESMEN, WAREHOUSEMEN, FOOD HANDLERS, CLERICAL & INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION TEAMSTERS UNION, LOCAL NO. 582, Affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, et al., Respondents. No. 81-7259. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 8, 1981. Decided March 3, 1982. Edward S. Dorsey, Washington, D. C., for petitioner. William A. Roberts, Vance, Davis, Roberts, Reid & Anderson, Seattle, Wash., for respondents. Application for Enforcement of Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before KILKENNY, GOODWIN and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. GOODWIN, Circuit Judge. 1 Pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 , et seq., the National Labor Relations Board petitions this court for enforcement of its order declaring unlawful the extension of vision care as part of the health-benefit package for members of Driver Salesmen, Warehousemen, Food Handlers, Clerical and Industrial Production Teamsters Union, Local No. 582 administered by the Inland Empire Teamsters Trust. 2 The Union and Associated Industries of Inland Empire,…