Warren C. Cordner and Evelyn C. Cordner v. United States

Good Law
671 F.2d 367·49 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1353·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21029
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 198280-5459California367 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kennedy, J.

Appellants own substantially all the outstanding shares of stock of First Thrift Investors, a California corporation, and they received 275 $20 Double Eagle gold coins as a corporate dividend distribution. The coins had been purchased by a First Thrift wholly-owned subsidiary at their fair market value and had been distributed to First Thrift Investors as a dividend. Appellants reported the dividend at the face value of the coins, $5,500, but, upon audit, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue charged appellants with a taxable dividend in an amount equal to the fair market value of the coins, which was $70,936. In the refund action brought by appellants below, after they had paid the deficiency under protest, the district court granted the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment.

Under section 301 of the Internal Revenue Code, the amount of any corporate distribution to non-corporate distributees, for dividend purposes, is “the amount of money received, plus the fair market value of the other property received.” I.R.C. § 301(b)(1)(A). We have no difficulty in holding that the gold coins here, though legal tender and hence “money” for some purposes, are also “property” to be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.