National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters Union Local No. 378

Good Law
672 F.2d 741·110 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2213·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20729
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 198279-7683California2,497 words

Opinion

Opinion

672 F.2d 741 110 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2213 , 93 Lab.Cas. P 13,427 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL NO. 378, affiliated with International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Respondent. No. 79-7683. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued Nov. 5, 1980. Decided March 24, 1982. Joseph Oertel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Thomas K. Cassidy, Hafer, Cassidy & Price, Seattle, Wash., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before SNEED and FARRIS, Circuit Judges, and EAST, * District Judge. FARRIS, Circuit Judge: 1 The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order requiring Teamsters Local No. 378 to bargain with the Olympia Automobile Dealers Association and prohibiting the Teamsters from giving effect to a separate agreement executed with Capitol Chevrolet Company. The Board's order followed its decision that the Teamsters violated section 8(b)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158 (b)(3), by separately negotiating an agreement with Capitol Chevrolet Company, an employer which had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.