Forro Precision, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.

Bad Law
673 F.2d 1045·10 Fed. R. Serv. 671·215 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 299·33 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1645·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20438
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 5, 198278-1455, 78-1755California8,245 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fletcher, J.

This action arises from a series of events in 1972 and 1973 that culminated in the search of the business premises of Forro Precision, Inc. (Forro) by the San Jose police, who were accompanied by and aided in the search by employees of the International Business Machines Corp. (IBM). Forro brought suit against IBM on the basis of its participation in the search and other conduct damaging to Forro. IBM, • in turn, counterclaimed against Forro.

After extensive pretrial proceedings, the claims by Forro were narrowed to contentions that IBM had intentionally interfered with prospective business advantage under California law and had monopolized and attempted to monopolize in violation of section 2 of the Sherman Act. 15 U.S.C. § 2 (1976). IBM’s contentions were narrowed to a counterclaim under California law that Forro had misappropriated its trade secrets. A jury found in favor of Forro on the intentional interference claim and awarded actual damages in the amount of $2,739,010. It found in favor of IBM on the misappropriation claim and awarded actual damages in the sum of $260,777, but deadlocked on the antitrust claims and on both parties’ claims for punitive damages.

The trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.