Northern California District Council Of Hod Carriers v. Opinski

Good Law
673 F.2d 1074
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 5, 198280-4511California767 words

Opinion

Opinion

673 F.2d 1074 110 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2205 , 93 Lab.Cas. P 13,428 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF HOD CARRIERS, BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION LABORERS, AFL-CIO, on behalf of itself and on behalf of Construction and General Laborers Union Local 1130, Petitioners-Appellants, v. E. J. OPINSKI, individually, dba/E. J. Opinski, Building Contractor; Tom Kuffel, individually, dba/Tom Kuffel Construction Company, Tom Kuffel Construction Company, Black Corporation, a corporation, White Company, a partnership, and Does I through X, inclusive, Respondents-Appellees. No. 80-4511. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 1982. Decided April 5, 1982. David A. Rosenfeld, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners-appellants; Victor J. Van Bourg, Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg & Roger, San Francisco, Cal., on brief. Mark R. Thierman, San Francisco, Cal., for respondents-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before WALLACE and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and CROCKER, * District Judge. KENNEDY, Circuit Judge: 1 The Northern California District Council of Hod Carriers (union) commenced an action to compel arbitration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.