Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility District v. Peter Johnson

Good Law
673 F.2d 1076·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20380
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 6, 198281-7561California4,336 words

Opinion

Opinion

673 F.2d 1076 CENTRAL LINCOLN PEOPLES' UTILITY DISTRICT, et al., Petitioners, Public Power Council, et al., Petitioner-Intervenors, v. Peter JOHNSON, as Administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration, Department of Energy, et al., Respondents, Aluminum Company of America, et al., Respondent-Intervenors. No. 81-7561. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 6, 1982. Decided April 6, 1982. James T. Waldron, Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland, Or., for petitioners. 1 Jack G. Collins, Portland, Or., Eric Redman, Seattle, Wash., Alvin Alexanderson, Portland, Or., argued for respondents; Peter Johnson, Bonneville Power Adm'r, Portland, Or., James Edwards, Secretary of Energy, Dept. of Energy, Washington, D. C., on brief. 2 James C. L. Baxendale, Portland, Or., for intervenor Portland Gen. Elec. Co. 3 William David Sprayberry, Vancouver, Wash., for intervenor Public Power Council. 4 Barton L. Kline, Boise, Idaho, for intervenor Idaho Power Co. 5 Robert E. Sullivan, Butte, Mont., for intervenor Montana Power Co. 6 John Wiley Gould, Portland, Or., for intervenor CP Nat. Corp. 7 Allan Hart, Portland, Or., for intervenor Staffer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.