Public Power Council v. Peter Johnson

Good Law
674 F.2d 791·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20202
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 13, 198281-7806California2,951 words

Opinion

Opinion

674 F.2d 791 PUBLIC POWER COUNCIL; City of Seattle, City Light Department; Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility District; City of Eugene, by the Eugene Water & Electric Board; City of Tacoma, Department of Public Utilities; Clatskanie Peoples' Utility District; Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County; Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Petitioners, and Pacific Power & Light Company, Portland General Electric Company, Puget Sound Power & Light Company, the Washington Water Power Company, Idaho Power Company, the Montana Power Company, Utah Power & Light Company, CP National Corporation, and the Columbia River Peoples' Utility District, Petitioner-Intervenors, v. Peter JOHNSON, as Administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration, Department of Energy, and James Edwards, as Secretary of the Department of Energy, and the United States of America, Respondents, and Aluminum Company of America, the Anaconda Company, Crown Zellerbach Corporation, Elkem Metals Company, Georgia Pacific Corporation, Hanna Nickel Smelting Company, Intalco Aluminum and Chemical Corporation, Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation, Martin Marietta Aluminum, Inc., Oregon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.