In Re the Petition of Lloyd E. Ashcom v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, in Re the Petition of Merel E. Babcock v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor

Good Law
674 F.2d 805·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20146
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 198281-7182California586 words

Opinion

Opinion

674 F.2d 805 In re the Petition of Lloyd E. ASHCOM, et al., Petitioners, v. Honorable Raymond J. DONOVAN, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Respondent. In re the Petition of Merel E. BABCOCK, et al., Petitioners, v. Honorable Raymond J. DONOVAN, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Respondent. Nos. 81-7182, 81-7587. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 12, 1982. Decided April 14, 1982. William F. Ferroggiaro, Jr., Eureka, Cal., for petitioners. Margrit Vanderryn, Atty., Washington, D. C., Deputy Commissioner, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Appeal from a Determination by the Secretary of Labor. Before HAYNSWORTH, * Senior Circuit Judge, and CHOY and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. CHOY, Circuit Judge: 1 Employees of Wayne Bare Trucking Company appeal from the Secretary of Labor's determination that they do not qualify for benefits under the Redwood National Park Expansion Act, Pub.L.No. 95-250, 92 Stat. 163 (1978). ** The Act increased the size of the Park and provided economic assistance to employees displaced by the expansion. Lanning v. Marshall, 650 F.2d 1055, 1056 (9th Cir. 1981). However, not every…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.