Aminoil v. California State Water Resources Control Board

Good Law
674 F.2d 1227
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 198280-5516California6,639 words

Opinion

Opinion

674 F.2d 1227 17 ERC 1702 , 12 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,594 AMINOIL U. S. A., INC., a Delaware corporation, and the Signal Bolsa Corporation, a California corporation, Petitioners-Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, Respondent. Amigos de Bolsa Chica, Inc., Real Party In Interest, Ann McGill Gorsuch, * Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Real Party In Interest-Appellee. No. 80-5516. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1981. Decided April 2, 1982. Victor J. Gold, Frederick A. Fudacz, Nossaman, Krueger & Marsh, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners-appellants. Martin W. Matzen, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., argued, for real party in interest-appellee; Andrea Sheridan Ordin, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., Anne S. Almy, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on brief. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before WALLACE and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, ** District Judge. WALLACE, Circuit Judge: 1 This case presents a troublesome jurisdictional issue arising in the wake of our decision in Shell Oil Co. v. Train, 585 F.2d 408 (9th Cir. 1978) (Shell ).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.