David Bruce Gilbert & Elinor Faye Gilbert v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Good Law
675 F.2d 1083·50 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5006·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19633
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 198281-7049California423 words

Opinion

Opinion

Appellants appeal from a decision of the Tax Court that determined deficiencies in their income tax and imposed additions to their tax. They assert that they were not represented by counsel in the Tax Court, that they had a right to be so represented, and that their waiver of their right was not voluntarily and intelligently made. Because their waiver in no way impaired the fairness of the Tax Court proceedings, we affirm.

Appellants filed no income tax returns for 1971 and 1972. The Commissioner, because of the appellants’ refusal to cooperate, reconstructed appellants’ income from bank records and testimony of third parties and determined their deficiencies. In addition, the Commissioner determined that a portion of Dr. Gilbert’s underpayment was due to fraud and assessed the fraud penalty provided by 26 U.S.C. § 6653 (b). He also determined that part of Mrs. Gilbert’s underpayment was due to negligence or intentional disregard and assessed the penalty provided by 26 U.S.C. §§ 6651 (a) and 6653(a). Appellants petitioned the Tax Court for redetermination of their liability and at their trial represented themselves.

Proceedings challenging the assessment of penalties under 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.