United States v. Allen

Good Law
675 F.2d 1373
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 198179-1059California6,471 words

Opinion

Opinion

675 F.2d 1373 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur A. ALLEN, Peter A. Diffenderfer, Kevin T. Kerr, William P. Kolander, Derek S. Sherman, Spencer C. Sherman, and Gary L. Theriaque, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 79-1059, 79-1060 and 79-1063 to 79-1067. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 10, 1979. Decided Nov. 5, 1980. Rehearing Denied Dec. 31, 1980. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc April 16, 1981. Martin Weinberg, Boston, Mass., Marcus S. Topel, San Francisco, Cal., argued for defendants-appellants; Oteri & Weinberg, Boston, Mass., Robert F. Collins, Troy & Collins, Dorchester, Mass., on brief. David Smith, Crim. Div., Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before KENNEDY, TANG and ALARCON, Circuit Judges. KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. 1 After customs interdiction of an amphibious operation to import over eight tons of marijuana, the participants were convicted of federal offenses. These appeals followed. Appellants allege the prosecution used evidence resulting from unlawful surveillance and illegal seizures and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.