United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Tulare Lake Canal Company, a Corporation, Defendant-Petitioner, Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District and Salyer Land Company, a Corporation, Intervenors-Defendants. United States of America v. Tulare Lake Canal Co., a Corp., and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, Intervenor-Defendant, and Salyer Land Co., a Corp., Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant. United States of America v. Tulare Lake Canal Co., a Corp., and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant, and Salyer Land Co., a Corp., Intervenor-Defendant

Good Law
677 F.2d 713·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19214
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 198278-1378California4,688 words

Opinion

Opinion

677 F.2d 713 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TULARE LAKE CANAL COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Petitioner, Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District and Salyer Land Company, a corporation, Intervenors-Defendants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TULARE LAKE CANAL CO., a corp., Defendant, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, Intervenor-Defendant, and Salyer Land Co., a corp., Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TULARE LAKE CANAL CO., a corp., Defendant-Appellant, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant, and Salyer Land Co., a corp., Intervenor-Defendant. Nos. 72-2322, 78-1378 and 78-1422. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 13, 1980. Decided May 17, 1982. Scott B. McElroy, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., argued, for United States; Charles E. Biblowit, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on brief. Robert M. Newell, Newell & Chester, Los Angeles, Cal., argued, for Tulare Lake Canal Co.; James G. McCain, Corcoran, Cal., on brief. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.