John C. Beck and Kathleen Beck v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Good Law
678 F.2d 818·50 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5149·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 18793
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 2, 198281-7053California1,974 words

Opinion

Opinion

Alarcon, J.

John C. and Kathleen Beck (“Taxpayers”) were limited partners in two California partnerships — Moreno Company Two (“Moreno 2”) and Riverside Two (“Riverside 2”) — formed for the purpose of purchasing commercial real estate. Taxpayers contributed a total of $23,085 to these partnerships and the following year sought to deduct claimed losses totaling $92,554 arising from their share of prepaid interest and loan points allegedly paid by the two part nerships under I.R.C. § 163(a). The Commissioner disallowed the deductions and assessed Taxpayers with a deficiency of $29,-067 for the year 1974. Taxpayers filed a complaint in the tax court. The tax court upheld the Commissioner’s decision and denied the deductions after finding that: (1) the purchase price far exceeded the properties’ fair market value; and (2) Taxpayers were not subject to personal liability on the underlying loan. The tax court concluded that, based on the above, the transactions lacked economic substance and therefore could not support interest deductions under I.R.C. § 163(a). See Beck v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 1534 (1980) (opinion of the tax court below).

On appeal, Taxpayers contend that, inter alia, (1) the tax…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.