Eva Rehner v. Baxter Rice, Individually and as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe v. State of Washington, the Tulalip Tribes of Washington, an Indian Tribe v. State of Washington
Opinion
Opinion
678 F.2d 1340 Eva REHNER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Baxter RICE, Individually and as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California, Defendant-Appellee. MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE of WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants-Appellants. The TULALIP TRIBES OF WASHINGTON, an Indian Tribe, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE of WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 77-2409, 79-4403 and 79-4404. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 10, 1982. Decided June 8, 1982. Stephan V. Quesenberry, Seattle, Wash., for Rehner. Matthew J. Coyle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Olympia, Wash., argued, for State of Wash.; Slade Gorton, Atty. Gen., Malachy R. Murphy, Deputy Atty. Gen., Olympia, Wash., on brief. William R. Winship, Jr., Alan S. Meth, San Diego, Cal., argued, for Rice; Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., on brief. Richard Reich, Auburn, Wash., for Muckleshoot Tribe. Douglas L. Bell, Everett, Wash., for Tulalip Tribe. Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, KENNEDY, TANG, FARRIS, PREGERSON, POOLE, CANBY, REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. TANG, Circuit Judge: 1 The three cases involved in…