Eva Rehner v. Baxter Rice, Individually and as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe v. State of Washington, the Tulalip Tribes of Washington, an Indian Tribe v. State of Washington

Good Law
678 F.2d 1340·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 18619
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 8, 198279-4403California7,821 words

Opinion

Opinion

678 F.2d 1340 Eva REHNER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Baxter RICE, Individually and as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California, Defendant-Appellee. MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE of WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants-Appellants. The TULALIP TRIBES OF WASHINGTON, an Indian Tribe, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE of WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 77-2409, 79-4403 and 79-4404. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 10, 1982. Decided June 8, 1982. Stephan V. Quesenberry, Seattle, Wash., for Rehner. Matthew J. Coyle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Olympia, Wash., argued, for State of Wash.; Slade Gorton, Atty. Gen., Malachy R. Murphy, Deputy Atty. Gen., Olympia, Wash., on brief. William R. Winship, Jr., Alan S. Meth, San Diego, Cal., argued, for Rice; Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., on brief. Richard Reich, Auburn, Wash., for Muckleshoot Tribe. Douglas L. Bell, Everett, Wash., for Tulalip Tribe. Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, KENNEDY, TANG, FARRIS, PREGERSON, POOLE, CANBY, REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. TANG, Circuit Judge: 1 The three cases involved in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.