Cel-A-Pak v. California Agricultural Labor Relations Board

Good Law
680 F.2d 664·34 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 687·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 17738
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 2, 198279-4743California2,081 words

Opinion

Opinion

680 F.2d 664 96 Lab.Cas. P 55,382 CEL-A-PAK, a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, United Farm Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Western Conference of Teamsters and General Teamsters Warehousemen and Helpers' Union Local No. 890, Defendants-Appellees. No. 79-4743. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 10, 1981. Decided July 2, 1982. Richard H. Foster, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. Ellen J. Eggers, Keene, Cal., Manuel M. Madeiros, Agricultural Labor Relations Bd., Sacramento, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, WRIGHT, Circuit Judge, and BYRNE, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 Cel-A-Pak, which harvests and packs cauliflower for independent growers, brought this action against the California Agricultural Labor Relations Board ("ALRB") and the United Farm Workers of America ("UFW") to prevent assertion by the ALRB of jurisdiction over Cel-A-Pak's employees and to recover damages from UFW for injuries allegedly caused by secondary boycotts. On motion for summary judgment,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.