United States v. Patrick W. Hanigan

Good Law
681 F.2d 1127·10 Fed. R. Serv. 1553·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 17350
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 198281-1262California3,322 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schroeder, J.

Patrick Hanigan appeals his conviction on three counts of aiding and abetting a robbery affecting commerce in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 . His principal challenge is to the district court’s jurisdiction to try him under that Act. He also contends that several evidentiary rulings by the district court were prejudicial, that his prosecution violated the double jeopardy clause of the Constitution, and that the pretrial identification procedure was imper-missibly suggestive. We affirm the conviction.

FACTS

On August 18, 1976, three undocumented Mexican aliens entered the United States near Douglas, Arizona. The government’s evidence showed that the men had previously entered this country and had found work as unskilled laborers in agricultural enterprises. On this occasion each had again crossed the border in search of agricultural work.

Defendant’s brother Thomas found the men on Hanigan land and forced them to accompany him to the family ranch house, where he was joined by his father, George Hanigan, and the defendant Patrick. Over the course of several hours, the victims were brutally tortured and robbed of their few possessions. They were then told to run for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.