Nos. 80-3490, 80-3514
Opinion
Opinion
681 F.2d 1203 69 A.L.R.Fed. 284, 1982-2 Trade Cases 64,878 BETASEED, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U AND I INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. U AND I INCORPORATED, Counterclaimant, Cross-Appellant, v. BETASEED, INC., Washington Sugar Beet Growers Association, the members andaffiliates of the Washington Sugar Beet Growers Association, Does 1 to 1500, inclusive, Counterclaim-Defendants, Cross-Appellees. Nos. 80-3490, 80-3514. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 5, 1982. Decided July 23, 1982. Peter S. Hendrixson, Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford, Whitney & Halladay, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff-appellant. Michael H. Salinsky, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, Cal., for U and I Inc.; Parker A. Maddux, San Francisco, Cal., on brief. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. Before KILKENNY, ANDERSON and ALARCON, Circuit Judges. ALARCON, Circuit Judge: 1 These appeals present, in the context of a private antitrust lawsuit, the familiar issue of whether the district court properly granted the parties' respective motions for summary judgment. In its complaint, Betaseed, Inc., alleges that U…