Nos. 80-3490, 80-3514

Good Law
681 F.2d 1203
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 23, 19821203California21,084 words

Opinion

Opinion

681 F.2d 1203 69 A.L.R.Fed. 284, 1982-2 Trade Cases 64,878 BETASEED, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U AND I INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. U AND I INCORPORATED, Counterclaimant, Cross-Appellant, v. BETASEED, INC., Washington Sugar Beet Growers Association, the members andaffiliates of the Washington Sugar Beet Growers Association, Does 1 to 1500, inclusive, Counterclaim-Defendants, Cross-Appellees. Nos. 80-3490, 80-3514. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 5, 1982. Decided July 23, 1982. Peter S. Hendrixson, Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford, Whitney & Halladay, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff-appellant. Michael H. Salinsky, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, Cal., for U and I Inc.; Parker A. Maddux, San Francisco, Cal., on brief. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. Before KILKENNY, ANDERSON and ALARCON, Circuit Judges. ALARCON, Circuit Judge: 1 These appeals present, in the context of a private antitrust lawsuit, the familiar issue of whether the district court properly granted the parties' respective motions for summary judgment. In its complaint, Betaseed, Inc., alleges that U…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.