United States v. Dennis James Banks, United States of America v. Russ Redner, United States of America v. Kenneth Moses Loud Hawk, United States of America v. Ka-Mook Banks

Good Law
682 F.2d 841
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 29, 198280-1574California2,648 words

Opinion

Opinion

682 F.2d 841 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis James BANKS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Russ REDNER, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Moses LOUD HAWK, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ka-Mook BANKS, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 80-1574, 80-1582, 80-1583 and 80-1630. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 7, 1981. Decided July 29, 1982. Kenneth S. Stern, Milwaukie, Or., argued, for Banks, Redner and Hawk; Rose & Stern, Milwaukie, Or., on brief, for Banks; S. Lynn Parkinson, Parkinson, Fontana, Schumann & Jones, Oregon City, Or., on brief, for Redner; Ronald P. Schiffman, Clackamas, Or., on brief, for Hawk. Michael T. Bailey, Portland, Or., for Nichols. Jack C. Wong, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., argued, for plaintiff-appellee; William Youngman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., on brief. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Before KENNEDY, FERGUSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. 1 Defendants Dennis Banks, Russ Redner and Kenneth Moses…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.