Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc., Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc., and General Mills Fun Group, Inc., Corporations, and Smeets en Schipper Spellen, B. v. a Corporation, as Co-Conspirator

Good Law
684 F.2d 1326
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 198279-4301California934 words

Opinion

Opinion

684 F.2d 1326 1982-2 Trade Cases 64,916 ANTI-MONOPOLY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MILLS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. ANTI-MONOPOLY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MILLS, INC., and General Mills Fun Group, Inc., Corporations, and Smeets En Schipper Spellen, B. V., a Corporation, as Co-Conspirator, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 78-2780, 79-4301. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued Aug. 10, 1981. Submitted Nov. 9, 1981. Decided Aug. 26, 1982. Carl E. Person, New York City, argued, for plaintiff-appellant; John Henry Denton, Denton, Jones & Chanin, Oakland, Cal., on brief. Robert S. Daggett, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before DUNIWAY and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and TASHIMA, * District Judge. DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge: 1 In these consolidated appeals, we reverse and remand summary judgments granted to defendants in antitrust cases brought under § 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15 , charging violations of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2. 2 In our No. 78-2780,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.