Fred George Cox v. Harry L. Hellerstein, Assistant Federal Public Defender, James F. Hewitt, Federal Public Defender

Good Law
685 F.2d 1098·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16278
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 198281-4397California606 words

Opinion

Opinion

Norris, J.

In 1978, appellant Fred George Cox was convicted by a jury of aggravated armed bank robbery. His conviction was affirmed on appeal, and a petition for writ of certiorari was denied by the United States Supreme Court. Appellee Harry L. Heller-stein, Assistant Federal Public Defender, represented Cox throughout trial and the appellate process.

In 1980, Cox filed a civil rights complaint alleging that Hellerstein, and appellee James F. Hewitt, Federal Public Defender, as Hellerstein’s supervisor, violated Cox’s federally-protected rights during the course of Hellerstein’s court-appointed representation of Cox. In his complaint, Cox alleged that Hellerstein was “ineffective, inadequate, incompetent, and unprofessional” as defense counsel. Cox alleged that Heller-stein failed to call witnesses who should have been called, worked for the prosecution to obtain a conviction, and divulged confidential matters to the prosecution. The district court granted Hellerstein’s motion to dismiss, and Cox appeals. We affirm on the ground that Polk County v. Dodson, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 445 , 70 L.Ed.2d 509 (1981) is controlling authority that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.