Ronwin v. State Bar of Arizona
Opinion
Opinion
686 F.2d 692 1981-2 Trade Cases 64,414 , 1982-83 Trade Cases 65,013 Edward RONWIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE BAR OF ARIZONA, Carlock, George Read and Wanda Myers, Robert D. and Judith Wolfinger, Harold J. and Jane Doe Richmond, James L. and Jane Doe Karman, Howard H. and Jane Doe Hoover, Charles R. and Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees. No. 80-5004. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 16, 1981. Decided Dec. 14, 1981. As Amended on Rehearing Sept. 8, 1982. 1 Edward Ronwin, pro se. 2 Timothy J. Burke, Fennemore, Craig, von Ammon & Udall, Phoenix, Ariz., argued, for defendants-appellees; Philip E. von Ammon, Phoenix, Ariz., on brief. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. 4 Before FERGUSON and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges, and HATTER, * District Judge. HATTER, District Judge: 5 Ronwin sued the Arizona State Bar ("Bar") and the individual members (and their spouses) of the Committee on Examinations and Admissions of the Arizona Supreme Court ("Committee"), alleging that they had violated federal antitrust laws in grading the 1974 Arizona bar examination that Ronwin failed. The district court denied Ronwin's…