Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility District v. Peter Johnson

Good Law
686 F.2d 708
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 198281-7561California4,405 words

Opinion

Opinion

686 F.2d 708 CENTRAL LINCOLN PEOPLES' UTILITY DISTRICT, et al., Petitioners, Public Power Council, et al., Petitioner-Intervenors, v. Peter JOHNSON, as Administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration, Department of Energy, et al., Respondents, Aluminum Company of America, et al., Respondent-Intervenors. No. 81-7561. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 6, 1982. Decided April 6, 1982. As Amended Sept. 7, 1982. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Sept. 27, 1982. James T. Waldron, Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland, Or., for petitioners. 1 Jack G. Collins, Portland, Or., Eric Redman, Seattle, Wash., Alvin Alexanderson, Portland, Or., argued for respondents; Peter Johnson, Bonneville Power Adm'r, Portland, Or., James Edwards, Secretary of Energy, Dept. of Energy, Washington, D. C., on brief. 2 James C. L. Baxendale, Portland, Or., for intervenor Portland Gen. Elec. Co. 3 William David Sprayberry, Vancouver, Wash., for intervenor Public Power Council. 4 Barton L. Kline, Boise, Idaho, for intervenor Idaho Power Co. 5 Robert E. Sullivan, Butte, Mont., for intervenor Montana Power Co. 6 John Wiley Gould, Portland, Or., for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.