Allen Archery, Inc. v. Jennings Compound Bow, Inc., Sportlab, Inc., Die Cast Products, Inc., Hugh Rich Archery, Inc., Pony Express Sport Shop, Inc., Arrow Mfg., Inc., Thomas P. Jennings, John Williamson, Individuals, Timothy Lee Moyer and Jonathan David Forgy, Individuals, D/b/a/ Arrow Archery Supply and Richard F. Garver, Sr. And Richard F. Garver, Jr., Individuals, D/b/a/ Shawnee Sports Center, Defendants- Jennings Compound Bow, Inc., Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Allen Archery, Inc., Holless W. Allen, Douglas Allen, Gregory Allen, Stephen Allen and Eugene Tracy, Individuals, Counter-Defendants-Appellees

Good Law
686 F.2d 780
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 8, 198281-5661California1,948 words

Opinion

Opinion

686 F.2d 780 216 U.S.P.Q. 585 ALLEN ARCHERY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JENNINGS COMPOUND BOW, INC., Sportlab, Inc., Die Cast Products, Inc., Hugh Rich Archery, Inc., Pony Express Sport Shop, Inc., Arrow Mfg., Inc., Thomas P. Jennings, John Williamson, individuals, Timothy Lee Moyer and Jonathan David Forgy, individuals, d/b/a/ Arrow Archery Supply and Richard F. Garver, Sr. and Richard F. Garver, Jr., individuals, d/b/a/ Shawnee Sports Center, Defendants- Appellants. JENNINGS COMPOUND BOW, INC., et al., Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALLEN ARCHERY, INC., Holless W. Allen, Douglas Allen, Gregory Allen, Stephen Allen and Eugene Tracy, individuals, Counter-Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 81-5661, 81-5685. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 5, 1982. Decided Sept. 8, 1982. Harlan P. Huebner, Huebner & Worrel, Los Angeles, Cal., D. A. N. Chase, Kansas City, Mo., for Allen Archery, Inc. Ellsworth R. Roston, Roston & Schwartz, Los Angeles, Cal., for Jennings Compound Bow, Inc. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before FLETCHER, PREGERSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.