In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296)

Good Law
688 F.2d 1297·34 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1669·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25147
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 1, 198281-7465California11,771 words

Opinion

Opinion

688 F.2d 1297 1982-2 Trade Cases 64,973 In re CEMENT ANTITRUST LITIGATION (MDL NO. 296). STATE OF ARIZONA, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT For the DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Kaiser Cement & Gypsum Corporation, et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. 81-7465. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 4, 1982. Decided Oct. 1, 1982. Josef D. Cooper, Frederick P. Furth, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for petitioners; Kenneth R. Reed, Phoenix, Ariz., Tracy R. Kirkham, Kirk A. McKinney, Cooper, Kirkham, Hainline & McKinney, P.C., Daniel S. Mason, Matthew A. Joseph, San Francisco, Cal., Peter K. Shack, Michael R. Granen, Deputy Attys. Gen., George Deukmejian, Atty. Gen., Robert H. Philibosian, Sanford N. Gruskin, Chief Asst. Attys. Gen., Las Angeles, on brief. David Bonderman, Washington, D.C., argued, for respondent; Jacqueline R. Denning, Richard C. Lowery, Washington, D.C., William J. Maledon, Phoenix, Ariz., On Petition for Writ of Mandamus United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before FERGUSON, NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. 1 Plaintiffs seek a writ of mandamus directing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.