United States v. William Gouveia, United States of America v. Robert Ramirez, United States of America v. Philip Segura, United States of America v. Adolpho Reynoso, United States of America v. Robert Eugene Mills, United States of America v. Richard Raymond Pierce

Good Law
692 F.2d 94
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 198282-1206California257 words

Opinion

Opinion

692 F.2d 94 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William GOUVEIA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Philip SEGURA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adolpho REYNOSO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Eugene MILLS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Raymond PIERCE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 81-1271 to 81-1274, 82-1206 and 82-1278. * United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Nov. 12, 1982. Michael J. Treman, Santa Barbara, Cal., for William Gouveia. Joseph Francis Walsh, Los Angeles, Cal., for Robert Ramirez. Joel Levine, Los Angeles, Cal., for Philip Segura. Manuel U.A. Araujo, Los Angeles, Cal., for Adolpho Reynoso. Nancy WiebenStock, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, WRIGHT, CHOY, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, SCHROEDER, POOLE, FERGUSON, and NELSON, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 A majority of the active judges has voted to consolidate United States v. Mills, et al., with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.