Albert R. Malanca and Robert Schaefer, Esq., Cross-Appellees v. Falstaff Brewing Company, a Corporation, Cross-Appellant. Albert R. Malanca, and Robert M. Schaefer v. General Brewing Company, Inc. S & P Company, Formerly Maier Maier Company and Falstaff Brewing Corporation

Good Law
694 F.2d 182·1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 23509
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 7, 198281-3600California1,462 words

Opinion

Opinion

694 F.2d 182 Albert R. MALANCA and Robert Schaefer, Esq., Cross-Appellees, v. FALSTAFF BREWING COMPANY, a corporation, Cross-Appellant. Albert R. MALANCA, and Robert M. Schaefer, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GENERAL BREWING COMPANY, INC.; S & P Company, formerly Maier Maier Company; and Falstaff Brewing Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 81-3600, 81-3655. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 4, 1982. Decided Dec. 7, 1982. Theodore F. Schwartz, Clayton, Mo., Paul R. Cressman, Sr., James A. Oliver, Short & Cressman, Seattle, Wash., for General Brewing. Paul L. Ahern, Roberts & Shefelman, Frederick M. Meyers, Karr, Tuttle, Koch, Campbell, Mawer & Morrow, Seattle, Wash., for Malanca. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Washington. Before WRIGHT, HUG, and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. HUG, Circuit Judge: 1 Albert Malanca and Robert Schaefer brought this contract action against General Brewing Company, Inc., S & P Company, and Falstaff Brewing Corporation for attorneys' fees allegedly due under an oral fee agreement. We reverse the district court order granting summary judgment to Malanca and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.