United States v. Helga Marie Adams, United States of America v. Masaru Shingaki, United States of America v. Jeni Mummert, AKA Jeni Proctor, United States of America v. Raymond James Proctor

Good Law
694 F.2d 200
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 7, 198282-1121California1,244 words

Opinion

Opinion

694 F.2d 200 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Helga Marie ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Masaru SHINGAKI, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeni MUMMERT, aka Jeni Proctor, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond James PROCTOR, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 82-1121, 82-1139, 82-1179 and 82-1180. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 1982. Decided Dec. 7, 1982. Paul A. Tomar, Honolulu, Hawaii, for Adams. No appearance for Shingaki. Pamela J. Berman, Honolulu, Hawaii, for Mummert. Earle A. Partington, Honolulu, Hawaii, for Proctor. Kathleen A. Felton, Washington, D.C., for U.S. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. Before CHOY, SNEED and FARRIS, Circuit Judges. CHOY, Circuit Judge: 1 Appellants Adams, Shingaki, Mummert, and Proctor were convicted on various counts relating to receiving, shipping, and distributing obscene print media involving minors. All four appellants challenge their convictions on the ground that the district court improperly failed to suppress evidence obtained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.