Re Naturalization of Renato Leopoldo Barretto v. United States of America, Re Naturalization of Antolin Punsalan Pangilinan v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Re Naturalization of Mario Valderrama Litonjua v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
694 F.2d 603
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 198281-5427California3,691 words

Opinion

Opinion

694 F.2d 603 Re Naturalization of Renato Leopoldo BARRETTO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. Re Naturalization of Antolin Punsalan PANGILINAN, et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee. Re Naturalization of Mario Valderrama LITONJUA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee. Nos. 80-4441, 80-4543 and 81-5427. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 13, 1982. Decided Dec. 10, 1982. Robert Grant Wealleans, Los Angeles, Cal., Donald L. Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., and Robert A. Mautino, San Diego, Cal., argued, for petitioners-appellants; Popkin, Shamir & Golan, Los Angeles, Cal., Simmons & Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., Baxley, Mautino & Ray, San Diego, Cal., on brief. John T. Bannon, Jr., Dept. of Justice, General Litigation & Legal Advice Section, Washington, D.C., argued, for respondent-appellee; Frank O. Bowman, III, Dept. of Justice, General Litigation & Legal Advice Section, Washington, D.C., on brief. Appeals from the United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.