United States v. Charles Tate, United States of America v. Ezeal Reaves, United States of America v. Roosevelt Montgomery, United States of America v. Johnny v. Williams, United States of America v. Norman Sweeney

Good Law
694 F.2d 1217
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 198281-1206California4,880 words

Opinion

Opinion

694 F.2d 1217 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Charles TATE, Defendant/Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Ezeal REAVES, Defendant/Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Roosevelt MONTGOMERY, Defendant/Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Johnny V. WILLIAMS, Defendant/Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Norman SWEENEY, Defendant/Appellant. Nos. 81-1206 to 81-1208, 81-1223 and 81-1233. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 12, 1982. Decided Dec. 21, 1982. Dave Whitney, Forest Fall, Cal., for Tate. Victor Sherman, Nasatir, Sherman & Hirsch, Los Angeles, Cal., for Reaves. Luke McKissack, Nasatir, Sherman & Hirsch, Los Angeles, Cal., for Montgomery. Victor Sherman, Los Angeles, Cal., for Williams. Anthony P. Capozzi, Robert A. Giovacchini, Fresno, Cal., for Sweeney. Brian Leighton, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fresno, Cal., for the U.S. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Before SKOPIL and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and ENRIGHT, * District Judge. POOLE, Circuit Judge. 1 Appellants appeal from their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.