30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 225, 31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 50, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,128 Joaquin Moreles Bonilla, Armando Cardenas, Enrique Cardenas, Heliodoro Cardenas, Benjamin Ceja, Jose Guzman, Jose Lopez, Luis Magallon, Octavio Marquez, Raul Mendez, Gilberto Palafox, Joel Pinedo, Felix R. Sanchez, Jesus Sanchez, Curtis Stredic, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, in Intervention v. Oakland Scavenger Company, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local 70, Perfecto Martinez v. Oakland Scavenger Company, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local 70

Good Law
697 F.2d 1297
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 198381-4522California4,433 words

Opinion

Opinion

697 F.2d 1297 30 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 225 , 31 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 50 , 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,128 Joaquin Moreles BONILLA, Armando Cardenas, Enrique Cardenas, Heliodoro Cardenas, Benjamin Ceja, Jose Guzman, Jose Lopez, Luis Magallon, Octavio Marquez, Raul Mendez, Gilberto Palafox, Joel Pinedo, Felix R. Sanchez, Jesus Sanchez, Curtis Stredic, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs in Intervention, v. OAKLAND SCAVENGER COMPANY, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local 70, Defendants. Perfecto MARTINEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OAKLAND SCAVENGER COMPANY, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local 70, Defendants. No. 81-4522. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 12, 1982. Decided Nov. 9, 1982. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Feb. 17, 1983. B.V. Yturbide, Gunheim & Yturbide, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs in intervention. Stephen A. McKae, Moore, Sizoo & Cantwell, Oakland, Cal., for defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.