Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Inc. v. Watson

Good Law
697 F.2d 1305·13 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20233·18 ERC (BNA) 1785·35 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1255·1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30923
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 198382-3206California4,862 words

Opinion

Opinion

697 F.2d 1305 18 ERC 1785 , 13 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,233 SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James WATSON, Forest Supervisor, United States Forest Service, et al., and Pacific Coast Molybdenum Co., and U.S. Borax & Chemical Corp., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 82-3206, 82-3241. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 19, 1982. Decided Jan. 31, 1983. Maria A. Iizuka, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued, for defendants-appellants; Clyde O. Martz, Davis, Graham & Stubbs, Denver, Colo., on brief. Durwood J. Zaelke, Juneau, Alaska, for plaintiff-appellee. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. Before PREGERSON, ALARCON and NELSON, Circuit Judges. NELSON, Circuit Judge: 1 Appellants challenge the district court's decision: (1) ordering preparation of a full environmental impact statement (EIS) addressing the proposed amendments to the 1980-83 plan of operations proposed by U.S. Borax & Chemical Corp. ("Borax") and Pacific Coast Molybdenum Co. ("PCM"); (2) enjoining Borax and PCM from mining activities pursuant to the amendments; and (3) enjoining the Forest Service from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.