Westlands Water District v. United States of America U.S. Department of Interior v. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc., Applicant for Intervention-Appellant

Good Law
700 F.2d 561·36 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 57·1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30054
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 1, 198381-4500California1,379 words

Opinion

Opinion

700 F.2d 561 WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America; U.S. Department of Interior, et al., Defendants-Appellees, v. ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC., Applicant for Intervention-Appellant. No. 81-4500. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 11, 1983. Decided March 1, 1983. Thomas Graff, Patricia Wells, Berkeley, Cal., for applicant for intervention-appellant. Adolph Moskovitz, Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard, Sacramento, Cal., Anne S. Almy, David Shilton, Washington, D.C., David Shilton, Land & Natural Res. Div., Washington, D.C., for appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Before MERRILL, WRIGHT and CHOY, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge: 1 The Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. ("EDF") appeals from the denial of its application for intervention as of right under Rule 24(a), F.R.Civ.P., and for permissive intervention under Rule 24(b). 1 EDF sought to intervene in an action for declaratory and injunctive relief brought by Westlands Water District ("Westlands") against the United States, the Department of the Interior, the Bureau of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.