Commodity Futures Trading Com'n v. Co Petro Marketing Group, Inc.

Good Law
700 F.2d 1279·10 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 414·1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29751
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 11, 198381-5862California3,650 words

Opinion

Opinion

700 F.2d 1279 10 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 414 , Bankr. L. Rep. P 69,108 COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. CO PETRO MARKETING GROUP, INC., a California corporation, et al., Defendants. LOO, MERIDETH & McMILLAN, Claimant/Appellant, v. Irving SULMEYER, Receiver/Appellee. No. 81-5862. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 4, 1983. Decided March 11, 1983. M. Sean McMillan, Loo, Merideth & McMillan, Los Angeles, Cal., for claimant/appellant. David M. Higgins, Overton, Lyman & Prince, Los Angeles, Cal., for receiver/appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before SKOPIL, NELSON, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. NELSON, Circuit Judge: 1 Appellant Loo, Merideth & McMillan appeals from a district court order declaring that appellant had violated a permanent injunction issued by the district court against any transfer of the assets of Co Petro Marketing Group, Inc. ("Co Petro"). The district court ordered appellant to return $60,000 it had received from Co Petro. Appellant contends (1) that the district court did not have jurisdiction to issue the order, (2) that the district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.