Duke v. Langdon

701 F.2d 768 31 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,507 Charla DUKE, Appellant, v. Emory LANGDON, as Regional Counsel, Western Region, Office of the Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, United States of America, James Booher, Lamont Olsen, John E. Lahart, Jr., Appellees. No. 81-4588. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 15, 1982. Decided Jan. 4, 1983. Opinion Filed on Petition for Rehearing March 16, 1983. Matthew A. Coles, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for appellant; Mary C. Dunlap, San Francisco, Cal., on brief. Deborah Seymour, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before KILKENNY, Senior Circuit Judge, FLETCHER, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Appellant Duke's petition for rehearing is granted, and the opinion previously filed is supplemented as follows:Ms. Duke contends that the IRS failed to afford the process due her in terminating her employment for unsatisfactory performance. She contends that section 522 of the Internal Revenue Service Manual 0431 and chapter 1, section 10, and chapter 6 of Order 1221.1A, Office of the…