Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Company

703 F.2d 534 1983-1 Trade Cases 65,239 , 35 UCC Rep.Serv. 1087 FOREMOST PRO COLOR, INC., a California corporation, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 80-5629. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 8, 1982. Decided Feb. 23, 1983. Robert C. Fortune, (argued), Downey, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. Neil M. Soltman (argued), Philip F. Westbrook, Thomas M. McCoy, O'Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. WALLACE, Circuit Judge: 1 Foremost Pro Color, Inc. (Foremost) appeals from the district court's judgment for Eastman Kodak Co. (Kodak). The district court dismissed Foremost's antitrust claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The court then granted Kodak's motion for summary judgment on four of Foremost's five breach of contract claims. After Foremost voluntarily dismissed the remaining contract claim, the district court entered final…