Committee For An Independent P-I v. The Hearst Corp.

Good Law
704 F.2d 467·9 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1489·1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28672
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 198382-3488California10,334 words

Opinion

Opinion

704 F.2d 467 1983-1 Trade Cases 65,334 , 9 Media L. Rep. 1489 COMMITTEE FOR AN INDEPENDENT P-I, People Opposed to a One-Newspaper Town, Committee for a Free Press, Longview Publishing Co., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. The HEARST CORP. and The Seattle Times Co., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, and William French Smith, Attorney General for the United States, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Nos. 82-3488, 82-3493 and 82-3523. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 17, 1982. Decided April 21, 1983. William L. Dwyer, Culp, Dwyer, Guterson & Grader, Seattle, Wash., for Committee For An Independent P-I. Jonathan E. Thackeray, Baker & Hostetler, Cleveland, Ohio, for Hearst Corp. Douglas Letter, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Smith & U.S. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Before ANDERSON, HUG, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: 1 This action presents issues of first impression concerning the scope and operation of the Newspaper Preservation Act. This Act permits competing newspapers that meet certain qualifications to enter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.