California Glazed Products, Inc. v. The Burns And Russell Company Of Baltimore City

Good Law
708 F.2d 1423·219 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 209·1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26528
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 198382-4129California4,348 words

Opinion

Opinion

708 F.2d 1423 219 U.S.P.Q. 209 , 1983-1 Trade Cases 65,467 CALIFORNIA GLAZED PRODUCTS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. The BURNS AND RUSSELL COMPANY OF BALTIMORE CITY, a Maryland corporation, Defendant-Appellee/Cross Appellant. Nos. 82-4129, 82-4135. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 12, 1983. Decided June 22, 1983. Richard Haas, Lasky, Haas, Cohler & Munter, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant/cross-appellee. Lawrence Alioto, Alioto & Alioto, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee/cross-appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before WISDOM * , Senior Circuit Judge, and SKOPIL and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Senior Circuit Judge: 1 This appeal presents the issue whether a trademark licensing agreement requiring California Glazed Products Co. ("CGP") to purchase from the Burns & Russell Company ("B & R") all the ingredients needed to make finished masonry blocks constitutes an unlawful tying arrangement in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1 (1976). 1 The jury found that an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.