Brandwein v. California Board of Osteopathic Examiners

Good Law
708 F.2d 1466·1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26413
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 198381-5343California5,551 words

Opinion

Opinion

708 F.2d 1466 Dr. Theodore S. BRANDWEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CALIFORNIA BOARD OF OSTEOPATHIC EXAMINERS; The California Board of Medical Quality Assurance; The California Department of Consumer Affairs; and Edwin L. Miller, District Attorney for the County of San Diego, State of California, Defendants-Appellees. No. 81-5343. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 3, 1982. Decided June 24, 1983. Dr. Theodore S. Brandwein, plaintiff-appellant, pro se. M. Gayle Askren, Deputy Atty. Gen., Greer D. Knopf, San Diego, Cal., Alexander R. Tobin, Upland, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Before SNEED, POOLE, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. POOLE, Circuit Judge: 1 Plaintiff-appellant Dr. Theodore S. Brandwein is a physician holding the degree of Doctor of Osteopathy (D.O.). Brandwein challenges the constitutionality of California Law, under which a D.O. may not hold himself out as a Doctor of Medicine (M.D.). He alleges that the law violates the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the federal constitution. Following the dismissal of these and pendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.