United States v. Eastman

Good Law
714 F.2d 76·1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 24658
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 198382-3450California357 words

Opinion

Opinion

714 F.2d 76 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas W. EASTMAN and Thelma M. Eastman, husband and wife: Jackson County, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Oregon; and 225.34 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Jackson County, State of Oregon, Defendants-Appellees. No. 82-3450. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 9, 1983. Decided Aug. 22, 1983. William A. Mansfield, Medford, Or., for defendants-appellees. Jacques B. Gelin, Robert L. Klarquist, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Before PECK, * FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court, 528 F.Supp. 1184 , awarding Thomas and Thelma Eastman (Eastmans) $161,125 in compensation for real property condemned in a dam construction project. The government asserts that the district court erred in including in the condemnation award $16,000 attributable to the increase in the value of the land from the date of initiation of the project to date of condemnation by reason of the proximity of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.