Jenny Flores v. Loretta Lynch

Good Law
828 F.3d 898·2016 WL 3670046·2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12439
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 6, 201615-56434California5,118 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hurwitz, J.

In 1997, the plaintiff class (“Flores”) and the government entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement”) which “sets out nationwide policy for the detention, release, and treatment of minors in the custody of the INS.” Settlement ¶ 9. The Settlement creates a presumption in favor of releasing minors and requires placement of those not released in licensed, non-secure facilities that meet certain standards.

In 2014, in response to a surge of Central Americans attempting to enter the United States without documentation, the government opened family detention centers in Texas and New Mexico. The detention and release policies at these centers do not comply with the Settlement. The government, however, claims that the Settlement only applies to unaccompanied minors and is not violated when minors accompanied by parents or other adult family members are placed in these centers.

In 2015, Flores moved to enforce the Settlement, arguing that it applied to all minors in the custody of immigration authorities. The district court agreed, granted the motion to enforce, and rejected the government’s alternative motion to modify the Settlement. The court ordered the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.