Adam Brooks v. Clark County

Good Law
828 F.3d 910·2016 WL 3632372·2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12510
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 201614-16424California5,047 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Scannlain, J.

We must decide whether a courtroom marshal is entitled to invoke absolute immunity as a defense to the allegation that he used excessive force when executing a judge’s order to remove a disruptive individual from her courtroom. If he is not, we must decide whether qualified immunity insulates him from having to pay damages for his allegedly unconstitutional conduct.

I

A

Adam Brooks is a bail enforcement agent who owns Las Vegas Fugitive Recovery, a bail enforcement agency licensed in Nevada. On October 4, 2011, Brooks and two fellow bail agents — John Kevin Smith and Matthew Penny — arrived at the Regional Justice Center in Las Vegas. They were in pursuit of Malena Reed and Mary Beth Lourcey, two women charged with conspiracy to make a bomb threat who were then appearing in the Justice Court, in the courtroom of Justice of the Peace Deborah Lippis, to waive their right to a preliminary hearing.

Brooks and his two compatriots were intent on taking Reed and Lourcey into custody, apparently at the behest of AIA Surety, a bail bond insurance company, because the ladies had allegedly failed to keep the company apprised of their whereabouts. Judge Lippis was having none of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.