Unigard Ins. Co. v. Harco National Ins. Co. CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 7, 2016A141452California3,789 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 7/7/16 Unigard Ins. Co. v. Harco National Ins. Co. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

UNIGARD INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A141452

v. HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE (San Francisco County COMPANY, et al., Super. Ct. No. CGC-13-527766) Defendants and Appellants.

In the course of his employment with Fork & Spoon (F&S), Adam Ike (Ike) rented a truck from Coast Truck Rental (Coast). He was tragically killed that same day when the very truck he rented ran over him. Ike’s heirs then sued Coast for wrongful death. The rental agreement, which had been signed by Ike on behalf of F&S, but not signed by Coast, included a provision that F&S, as the renter, would indemnify Coast for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.