Magno

Magno v. The College Network, Inc.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 8, 2016D067687California5,403 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/14/16; pub. order 7/8/16 (see end of opn.)

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BERNADETTE MAGNO et al., D067687

Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2014-00003057-

CU-FR-CTL)

THE COLLEGE NETWORK, INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Joel M.

Pressman, Judge. Affirmed.

Reich Radcliffe & Hoover, Adam T. Hoover and Richard J. Radcliffe, for

Defendant and Appellant.

Law Offices of Hannah J. Bingham and Hannah J. Bingham; Scott A. Savary for

Plaintiffs and Respondents.

The College Network, Inc. (TCN) appeals from an order denying its motion to

compel arbitration of a consumer fraud and breach of contract action brought by Plaintiffs Bernadette Magno, Rosanna Garcia, and Sheree Rudio. TCN argues the

arbitration provision in Plaintiffs' purchase agreements is valid and enforceable and

contends the trial court erred when it ruled the provision unconscionable. Alternatively,

TCN argues that if the forum selection clause is unconscionable, the court abused its

discretion in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.