Marriage of Shine CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 11, 2016D069067California2,420 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/11/16 Marriage of Shine CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In re the Marriage of PAULA SHINE and

DARREN SHINE.

D069067

PAULA SHINE,

Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. FAMVS900897)

v.

DARREN SHINE,

Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Khymberli

S. Apaloo, Judge. Affirmed.

Alderson Law Firm and James A. Alderson for Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.

After a long-term marriage, the trial court in this dissolution proceeding awarded

one spouse $1,000 a month in alimony. The trial court based its ruling not only its

finding as to the length of the marriage, but also its determination that the parties experienced a working class lifestyle during the course of their marriage; that the

supported…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.